Home | Ask Your Question | Mortgage Glossary
Find me a lender for:  

Refinancing That Makes You Poorer

Refinancing That Makes You Poorer

May 16, 2005

Of every 10 letters I receive asking my opinion of a proposed refinance, I advise 7 or 8 that the refinance would make them poorer. My letters are not from a cross-section of prospective borrowers, so perhaps the comparable figure over the market generally is 3 or 4. That still qualifies as a mass seduction. Although borrowers participate willingly, many will regret their decisions in the morning.

In most markets, bad decisions can safely be ignored because the costs of mistakes are small and people learn from them; the second and third times around, they make better decisions. In the mortgage market, however, transactions are large and infrequent, so mistakes are much more costly.

What Is a Bad Refinance Decision?

It is a decision that results in the borrower being poorer in the future than he would have been had he not refinanced. It also can mean raising money at a cost well above that of readily available alternatives. Here is an example of the first:

Smith has a fixed-rate mortgage with a balance of $164,000 at 5.375%, and with 18 years to go. She refinances into a 5�year adjustable rate mortgage at 5.875% that is interest only (IO) for 5 years. This reduces her monthly payment from $1186 to $803, or by $383.

Over 5 years, the new IO mortgage will save $23,012 in payments, but the balance will be $164,000, the same as now. Had Smith retained her original mortgage, the balance would be paid down to $132,975, a reduction of $31,025. After 5 years, Smith would be $8,013 poorer.

Hucksters argue that Smith could invest the payment savings, but few consumers have either the discipline or investment skills needed to pull this off successfully. Smith would have to earn 11.64% just to break even. For most consumers, amortizing a mortgage remains the best way to save.

Why do people make so many bad refinance decisions? The three major reasons are borrower shortsightedness, meretricious mortgages, and the dysfunctional incentive systems of loan providers.

Borrower Shortsightedness

The great majority of those who make bad refinance decisions are either payment-myopic or cash-dazzled. Smith in my example was payment-myopic -- she focused on the amount she had to pay every month and ignored how much she owed.

Cash-dazzled borrowers are equally short-sighted, but their focus is on the cash they raise with a "cash-out" refinance. Often they have no idea what that cash is costing them. Here is an illustration:

Jones has a fixed-rate mortgage with a balance of $190,000 at 5.75%, and with 28 years to go. Jones needs $16,000 in cash and refinances into a 6.50% mortgage for $206,000. Jones believes he is paying 6.5% on his $16,000, which is why he chose it rather than a second mortgage available at 7.5%.

But Jones fails to take account of the increase in the rate on $190,000. When that is added in, the cost of the $16,000 raised with a cash-out refinance increases to almost 12%, or well above the cost of a second mortgage.

Meretricious Mortgages

Meretricious, meaning "falsely attractive", was originally applied to London street walkers, who appeared attractive in the shadows but not so good in the light. Some mortgages are like that.

Adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) with an interest-only option, and especially the flexible-payment or option ARM, have exploded in popularity recently. While these ARMs have legitimate applications, the surge in popularity is due to their appeal to payment myopic borrowers. These mortgages reduce payments now, and extract their pound of flesh later.

Dysfunctional Incentive Systems

Most borrowers will shy away from loan providers who charge for information � such as information on whether the borrower will really benefit from a refinance. As a result, with very few exceptions, loan officers and mortgage brokers get paid only if a loan closes.

I know mortgage brokers who will not refinance a borrower who cannot benefit from it. The broker�s reward can be a future referral from a grateful borrower, but in most cases the reward is received in heaven.

Such people are treasures but they comprise a small part of the market. The rest are hell-bent to close loans. They reinforce borrower shortsightedness and leave the meretricious mortgages in the shadows.

How do you avoid being seduced? Check my tutorials on interest-only and option ARMs. They can show what it may cost you tomorrow to lower your payment today. Tutorial-phobic borrowers should take advantage of the 3-day right of rescission to reconsider their deal, preferably with the help of a knowledgeable third party. And don�t respond to solicitations!

Copyright Jack Guttentag 2005

 

Jack Guttentag is Professor of Finance Emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Visit the Mortgage Professor's web site for more answers to commonly asked questions.

Search More Info On:

  • borrower
  • why invest
  • money invest
  • year adjustable rate
  • how invest
  • adjustable rate mortgage
  • Shop For Your Mortgage Now!
    Shop For Your Mortgage Now!

    You'll be re-directed to Top-Lenders.com

     


    Related Articles From Mortgage Professor's web site:

    Qualifying For a Mortgage
    December 12, 2000 Most potential borrowers are nervous about getting a mortgage loan because they share a widespread misperception: the misperception is that they have no bargaining power relative to lenders, and therefore must approach them ... more...

    HUD's Proposals For Reform
    October 19, 2002 On July 29, 2002, HUD released a set of proposals to substantially change the ways in which home loans are originated in the US.  As usual, the proposals were open for comment, and many thousands of them were received.  Mine was among them, and is shown ... more...

    Questions About the Failure of Mortgage Locks
    December 15, 2003  ?Why have lock failures increased recently? A lock failure occurs when a lender does not honor a mortgage price that a borrower had believed was guaranteed. Lock failures occur when interest rates are rising and honoring locks is costly to lenders. ... more...

    HUD and Yield Spread Premiums
    October 3, 2001 The recent decision of the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Culpepper vs Irwin has suddenly swung the spotlight on HUD policy regarding yield spread premiums (YSPs) retained by mortgage brokers.  To this date, HUD has been impotent in dealing ... more...


    More on borrower...