Of every 10 letters I receive asking my
opinion of a proposed refinance, I advise 7 or 8 that the refinance would make
them poorer. My letters are not from a cross-section of prospective borrowers,
so perhaps the comparable figure over the market generally is 3 or 4. That still
qualifies as a mass seduction. Although borrowers participate willingly, many
will regret their decisions in the morning.
In most markets, bad decisions can safely be
ignored because the costs of mistakes are small and people learn from them; the
second and third times around, they make better decisions. In the mortgage
market, however, transactions are large and infrequent, so mistakes are much
more costly.
What Is a Bad Refinance Decision?
It is a decision that results in the borrower
being poorer in the future than he would have been had he not refinanced. It
also can mean raising money at a cost well above that of readily available
alternatives. Here is an example of the first:
Smith has a fixed-rate mortgage with a balance of $164,000 at 5.375%,
and with 18 years to go. She refinances into a 5�year adjustable rate mortgage
at 5.875% that is interest only (IO) for 5 years. This reduces her monthly
payment from $1186 to $803, or by $383.
Over 5 years, the new IO mortgage will save
$23,012 in payments, but the balance will be $164,000, the same as now. Had
Smith retained her original mortgage, the balance would be paid down to
$132,975, a reduction of $31,025. After 5 years, Smith would be $8,013 poorer.
Hucksters argue that Smith could invest the
payment savings, but few consumers have either the discipline or investment
skills needed to pull this off successfully. Smith would have to earn 11.64%
just to break even. For most consumers, amortizing a mortgage remains the best
way to save.
Why do people make so many bad refinance
decisions? The three major reasons are borrower shortsightedness, meretricious
mortgages, and the dysfunctional incentive systems of loan providers.
Borrower Shortsightedness
The great majority of those who make bad
refinance decisions are either payment-myopic or cash-dazzled.
Smith in my example was payment-myopic -- she focused on the amount she had to
pay every month and ignored how much she owed.
Cash-dazzled borrowers are equally
short-sighted, but their focus is on the cash they raise with a "cash-out"
refinance. Often they have no idea what that cash is costing them. Here is an
illustration:
Jones has a fixed-rate mortgage with a balance of $190,000 at 5.75%, and
with 28 years to go. Jones needs $16,000 in cash and refinances into a 6.50%
mortgage for $206,000. Jones believes he is paying 6.5% on his $16,000, which
is why he chose it rather than a second mortgage available at 7.5%.
But Jones fails to take account of the
increase in the rate on $190,000. When that is added in, the cost of the $16,000
raised with a cash-out refinance increases to almost 12%, or well above the cost
of a second mortgage.
Meretricious Mortgages
Meretricious, meaning "falsely attractive",
was originally applied to London street walkers, who appeared attractive in the
shadows but not so good in the light. Some mortgages are like that.
Adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) with an
interest-only option, and especially the flexible-payment or option ARM, have
exploded in popularity recently. While these ARMs have legitimate applications,
the surge in popularity is due to their appeal to payment myopic borrowers.
These mortgages reduce payments now, and extract their pound of flesh later.
Dysfunctional Incentive Systems
Most borrowers will shy away from loan
providers who charge for information � such as information on whether the
borrower will really benefit from a refinance. As a result, with very few
exceptions, loan officers and mortgage brokers get paid only if a loan closes.
I know mortgage brokers who will not
refinance a borrower who cannot benefit from it. The broker�s reward can be a
future referral from a grateful borrower, but in most cases the reward is
received in heaven.
Such people are treasures but they comprise a
small part of the market. The rest are hell-bent to close loans. They reinforce
borrower shortsightedness and leave the meretricious mortgages in the shadows.
How do you avoid being seduced? Check my
tutorials on interest-only and option ARMs. They can show what it may cost you
tomorrow to lower your payment today. Tutorial-phobic borrowers should take
advantage of the 3-day right of rescission to reconsider their deal, preferably
with the help of a knowledgeable third party. And don�t respond to
solicitations!
Copyright Jack Guttentag 2005
Jack Guttentag is Professor of Finance Emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Visit the Mortgage Professor's web site for more answers to commonly asked questions.
Related Articles From Mortgage Professor's web site:
Qualifying For a Mortgage
December 12, 2000
Most potential borrowers are
nervous about getting a mortgage loan because they share a widespread
misperception: the misperception is that they have no bargaining power
relative to lenders, and therefore must approach them ...
more...
HUD's Proposals For Reform
October 19, 2002
On July 29, 2002, HUD released a set of
proposals to substantially change the ways in which home loans are originated in
the US. As usual, the proposals were open for comment, and many thousands
of them were received. Mine was among them, and is shown ...
more...
Questions About the Failure of Mortgage Locks
December 15, 2003
?Why
have lock failures increased recently?
A
lock failure occurs when a lender does not honor a mortgage price that a
borrower had believed was guaranteed. Lock failures occur when interest rates
are rising and honoring locks is costly to lenders. ...
more...
HUD and Yield Spread Premiums
October 3, 2001
The recent decision
of the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Culpepper vs
Irwin has suddenly swung the spotlight on HUD policy regarding yield spread
premiums (YSPs) retained by mortgage brokers.
To this date, HUD has been impotent in dealing ...
more...